Traditional AI could be limited in scope yet consistent and scalable, a demonstration of the classic advantages of computer processing. However, since the advent of generative AI, we're now witnessing systems that can showcase the strengths and vulnerabilities of the human language.

Yet, while creativity has been introduced to AI platforms, so too have the challenges of hallucinations.

These systems don’t literally hallucinate, of course—it’s a metaphor that neatly captures a situation where AI systems yield skewed or even nonsensical outputs. The possibility of hallucination may make these systems look less trustworthy and reliable, too. How can you know you’re not getting an answer that’s presented well but utterly incorrect?

In this guide, we’ll cover some of the things you need to know about AI hallucinations. We’ll start with a clear definition, then dive into the causes behind them, explore their impact on different industries, offer practical tips for managing them, and finally take a look at the future of this challenge.

What are AI hallucinations and why do they happen?

AI hallucinations refer to instances where AI models produce outputs that are confidently stated but are partially or entirely incorrect. The term 'hallucination' is generally used in the context of generative AI, as its outputs can easily be perceived as accurate, whereas incorrect outputs from other AI models are often more visibly erroneous.

These hallucinations can occur across various types of generative AI, but they are most commonly found in language and image models. These models may produce outputs that superficially appear to fulfill their prompts, but closer examination often reveals that the results are non-viable or incorrect.

What causes hallucination in AI?

Generative AI platforms are trained using specific data to perform specific functions, but veering away from these functions is not the only potential risk. There are various issues that can lead to hallucination, including the following.

Overly challenging prompts

When an AI model is given a prompt that pushes it to perform a task it isn’t adequately equipped to handle, the resulting output is likely to be deeply flawed. If a prompt demands clear answers from a system that doesn’t have them—such as, for instance, asking a language model to predict specific stock market movements—the system might output an answer with no basis in verified knowledge.

Limited or imbalanced training data

An AI system’s output is only as good as the data used to train it. When that training data has significant information gaps, the system will likely struggle to handle related prompts; when this happens, the AI is prone to conjuring-up assumptions to fill in the blanks. Likewise, when training data is heavily imbalanced in some way that carries major inaccuracies, the outputs will reflect that imbalance and perpetuate those inaccuracies. For example, a language model not trained on coding languages will not perform well at generating viable code.

Supplemental data sourcing

Having live access to external sources can enhance an AI model’s capabilities, but also opens the door to potential errors. When a model pulls in data from online sources, for example, it can’t know how accurate that data is; without an effective verification mechanism, it can end up stating something wildly incorrect and presenting it as truth.

Excessive generalization

Models generate outputs using patterns gleaned from training data, but those patterns are rarely universally applicable. If it encounters a prompt that seems adequately similar to the examples it was trained on, a model can mistakenly assume that it can safely follow its usual patterns, which could lead to flawed results.

Absent feedback from humans

AI platforms don’t actually understand language the way humans do; they convert prompts into mathematical representations, predict likely sequences of words via statistical models, and generate output by converting their predictions back into text. As a result, they need their outputs vetted through observation and feedback. When systems are trained too quickly (or worse, trained with other AI systems handling oversight), their outputs can become unmoored from reality.

Whatever the potential issues, dealing with AI hallucination is a necessary step towards developing a trustworthy AI.

AI hallucination examples

Generative AI is being used increasingly across various sectors, but hallucination has the potential to cause great disruptions anywhere, at any time. Let’s look at some examples.

Healthcare

Given the stakes involved in healthcare, AI hallucinations can have serious consequences. For example, while AI technology is highly effective at assessing medical imagery, it still isn’t perfect; such a system could falsely interpret an anomaly as an indication of a serious problem. If its results were announced without first being thoroughly checked by a qualified clinician, it could lead to unnecessary worry. Of course, the opposite scenario—the system outputting false negatives or failing to identify a real condition—is even more problematic.

Another area of concern is in treatment management. AI tools linked to smart health devices can be excellent at overseeing and tweaking courses of treatment, but hallucination of patient data could lead to the wrong dosage being prescribed, potentially causing harm. Any AI systems used in frontline healthcare and clinical treatment must have reliable safeguards and checks in place.

Finance

AI hallucinations can be incredibly costly in the finance sector. An AI platform set towards market forecasting needs to be highly consistent, as any hallucinated outputs could result in confident yet misguided investment decisions. Since trust and confidence are paramount in finance, a firm making even a few poor recommendations could quickly lose clients.

A nightmare scenario for AI hallucinations in finance could be a major bank relying on a flawed AI system for critical tasks like risk ratings. Problems in finance have the potential to snowball, so a single erroneous output during trend analysis could trigger widespread market disruption.

Automotive

In the industry of self-driving vehicles, an AI system that hallucinates may misread road signs, view safe objects as hazards, or fail to recognize danger. For example, this AI might interpret shadows as actual barriers or mistake a billboard for a traffic sign. These mistakes may jeopardize safety, particularly if the system acts with assurance based on false assessments.

Currently, this risk is mitigated by keeping autonomous driving as an assisted system, where human drivers can take control if needed. However, strong data verification and fail-safe measures will become necessary if fully autonomous cars become commonplace.

Customer service

AI hallucinations in customer service systems can reduce user satisfaction, undermine brand loyalty, and potentially cause the loss of business. For example, users relying on virtual assistants to solve an issue with a product or service may lose trust in an organization when faced with unreliable or indecipherable information caused by hallucinations. Ensuring accuracy in AI-generated interactions is crucial for maintaining customer confidence.

Natural sciences

In the natural sciences, AI hallucinations can distort research findings by detecting false correlations and identifying patterns that do not actually exist. And with vast amounts of data to analyze in major fields—such as astronomical movement or air quality—it becomes more challenging to painstakingly verify AI findings. This then increases the risk of hallucinatory conclusions slipping through.

Complicating matters, the natural sciences can cover matters of great public importance, such as climate modeling, disease tracking, or environmental forecasting. Misallocating resources in this field not only wastes funds but also risks undermining public trust. Since a loss of confidence in scientific legitimacy would be deeply concerning, AI tools must be developed with great care to help prevent such outcomes.

Manufacturing

AI hallucinations in manufacturing environments can cause significant operational disruptions and financial losses. Predictive maintenance systems, which analyze equipment data to forecast potential failures, are increasingly used to minimize downtime. This means that a hallucination in this context could lead to false predictions of imminent breakdowns, unnecessarily halting production and prompting an investigation into equipment that doesn’t need attention.

Additionally, hallucinations can jeopardize critical supply chains. If inventory levels are incorrectly assessed, it could create the illusion of either surplus or shortage, with potentially damaging consequences throughout the production process. Manufacturing companies must combine robust data validation and verification procedures with skilled human oversight to reduce these risks and guarantee the accuracy of maintenance and analytics systems.

Preventing and mitigating AI hallucinations

If you're wondering how to prevent AI hallucinations, it's unfortunately much easier said than done. Reducing them requires a commitment to managing data, refining models, and having skilled individuals available to evaluate outputs. Let’s dive into some of the steps you can take, and the necessary resources to help make this process happen.

Ensure data integrity

Robust enterprise AI systems require consistently high-quality and relevant data. To achieve this, you’ll need to set up stringent data validation, invest in thorough data audits, and clean or remove any data that doesn’t meet standards. Automation can support this process by using AI systems to flag potential issues—but it's still crucial to manually review everything flagged before taking corrective actions.

Keep AI models updated

AI models can become outdated just like any other software system, and their stagnation will result in more hallucinations as the prompts stray beyond their predefined capabilities. Scheduling semi-frequent fine-tuning sessions with fresh data will help set up human-led reinforcement learning to pick out serious inaccuracies.

Implement retrieval-augmented generation

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a method of pairing the unpredictable pattern prediction of generative AI with a system that keeps its output aligned with the provided information. It can also provide citations to help the user follow the information trail back to the original source for vetting. Choosing RAG and feeding it well-maintained knowledge bases helps to create a solid guard against hallucinations. For extra safety, you can also set up a system to rate outputs for reliability and flag models for review if they fall below your required thresholds.

Establish a human-in-the-loop framework

Applied broadly within the AI field, human-in-the-loop (HITL) stresses the need to involve humans at all operation stages. While automation plays a crucial role, it’s essential that the output of one AI model is reviewed by an expert before being fed into another system. Although human error cannot fully eliminate the risk of hallucinations, incorporating HITL can reduce their likelihood and help to ensure higher-quality outputs.

Shore-up anomaly detection and output validation

Strong anomaly detection can flag outputs that deviate from expected patterns, helping you check potential hallucinations before they cause any problems. Output validation will support this process by comparing outputs to examples you’ve provided for validation. The more steps you have in place to flag or check results, the harder it will be for anything inaccurate to get through.

Can we conquer AI hallucinations?

AI hallucinations are a persistent and significant challenge within generative AI, and finding a way to mitigate them is crucial for the future of automation. But is it something we can realistically overcome in the near future? Let’s look at what could be ahead.

Advancements in AI model architecture: Just as computer systems have evolved, AI will continue to improve by integrating improvements in individual components. These developments will eventually combine into more complex systems which, over time, could become trustworthy enough to function with minimal human oversight when necessary—though for many uses it will always be advisable to maintain a human in the loop.
Increased collaboration with human expertise: As AI technology improves, human involvement will become more streamlined. We can expect systems to be designed to actively seek human input, with subject-matter experts playing a key role in providing support and validating results.
More robust implementation of regulatory frameworks: As AI tools become more widely used, regulations will be developed or enforced to ensure that organizations implement adequate data validation protocols, keep their systems updated, and use AI responsibly. This is especially important in sensitive applications like emotional support or health-related services, where protecting user data and preventing harmful advice is crucial.
Better quality assurance: Companies deploying AI tools will increasingly integrate comprehensive quality assurance processes, following a HITL approach. Full-spectrum data validation and benchmark comparisons are likely to enhance the consistency and reliability of AI outputs.
Contextual awareness: Future AI systems will be more efficient at understanding subtleties through contextual clues. This improved ability could reduce hallucinations by ensuring better comprehension of inputs and prompts, working to prevent misunderstandings.
Better AI-driven tools for detecting hallucinations. The development of AI tools designed to detect and correct hallucinations in other AI models will become more common. While no single tool may be perfect, a series of passes through different systems could identify and filter out most hallucinations, with human oversight to catch any that slip through.

As advancements continue, we’ll likely see AI systems become more capable of functioning accurately and autonomously without hallucination—though human oversight will always play a crucial role in ensuring their safety and efficacy.

Mastering private AI deployments

Is your business ready for a secure, private AI deployment?

Download the eBook

Understanding AI hallucination